Farming household types and their characterization in complex crop-livestock smallholder agricultural systems for contextual analysis and extension intervention: case of Riviridzi Catchment in Ntcheu

cg.contactp.mponela@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIATen_US
cg.contributor.centerCRP on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.crpCRP on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
cg.coverage.admin-unitNtcheuen_US
cg.coverage.countryMWen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.creator.idMponela, Powell: 0000-0003-4269-0663en_US
cg.creator.idTamene, Lulseged: 0000-0002-3806-8890en_US
cg.creator.idNdengu, Gift: 0000-0002-3445-6298en_US
cg.creator.idLe, Quang Bao: 0000-0001-8514-1088en_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2017-11-30en_US
cg.subject.agrovocfarming systemsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsmallholder farmersen_US
dc.contributorTamene, Lulsegeden_US
dc.contributorNdengu, Giften_US
dc.contributorLe, Quang Baoen_US
dc.creatorMponela, Powellen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-10T06:48:22Z
dc.date.available2016-02-10T06:48:22Z
dc.description.abstractTypology of farming units (households and farms) is deemed essential for targeted research and development programs. We employ the sustainable livelihood framework to collect integrated dataset for household, landscape and infrastructural attributes to quantitatively group farming units into plausible types. Interestingly it is noted that small scale farmers in the maize mixed farming system are heterogeneous and could be potentially grouped using principal component analysis (PCA) and K-mean cluster analysis (CA) into 3 classes. Income was the variable with the most discriminating power that significantly distinguished the classes into plausible types. Variables with high discriminating power between types I and II include family labour, transport facilities, household and farm equipment and tropical livestock units per person. Household types I and III differ significantly in terms of age and level of education of the household head. The types II and III are significantly distinguished only by income levels. The types identified are homogenous within a range of attribute values which can be used for technology targeting, extrapolation domain for supporting out-scaling of impacts and used for system modelling that copes with socio-ecological diversity.en_US
dc.formatDOCXen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/1VS4BJHH/v/b94351beb16030fdced91c572ca9865cen_US
dc.identifier.citationPowell Mponela, Lulseged Tamene, Gift Ndengu, Quang Bao Le. (30/1/2016). Farming household types and their characterization in complex crop-livestock smallholder agricultural systems for contextual analysis and extension intervention: case of Riviridzi Catchment in Ntcheu. Amman, Jordan: CRP on Dryland Systems (DS).en_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/4266
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCRP on Dryland Systems (DS)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.titleFarming household types and their characterization in complex crop-livestock smallholder agricultural systems for contextual analysis and extension intervention: case of Riviridzi Catchment in Ntcheuen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
dcterms.available2016-01-30en_US

Files