The association of biomass allocation with growth and water use efficiency of two Triticum aestivum cultivars

cg.contactunknown@unknownaddress.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUtrecht University - UUen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1071/PP9960751en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0310-7841en_US
cg.issue6en_US
cg.journalAustralian Journal of Plant Physiologyen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwheaten_US
cg.subject.agrovocgrowthen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwater-use efficiencyen_US
cg.volume23en_US
dc.contributorVeneklaas, Erik J.en_US
dc.contributorLambers, Hansen_US
dc.creatorvan den Boogaard, Rikien_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-13T21:39:40Z
dc.date.available2021-09-13T21:39:40Z
dc.description.abstractWe investigated traits that might improve performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a dry environment, and examined if the response to drought is different for cultivars with a contrasting biomass allocation pattern, using two cultivars with either a high (Katya) or small (Mexipak) proportion of biomass allocated to the leaves. Plants were grown in pots placed in the field, under well-watered conditions and under intermittent drought. Katya allocated a greater proportion of its biomass to both leaves and roots, and a smaller proportion to stems than Mexipak did. The growth rate of Katya was not higher despite a higher investment in leaf area and a slightly higher rate of photosynthesis, possibly due to concomitantly higher respiratory losses. Under well-watered conditions, the efficiency of water use for growth was higher for Katya than for Mexipak, due to a lower water use at a similar growth rate. Differences in water use per plant were determined by the rate of water loss or uptake, rather than by the amount of roots or leaves. A high water use efficiency was independent of growth rate. We conclude that a lower rate of water use due to a lower transpiration per unit leaf area linked with a high leaf area can contribute to improve the performance of wheat cultivars in a water-limited environment.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationRiki van den Boogaard, Erik J. Veneklaas, Hans Lambers. (1/1/1996). The association of biomass allocation with growth and water use efficiency of two Triticum aestivum cultivars. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 23 (6), pp. 751-761.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/13693
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen_US
dc.sourceAustralian Journal of Plant Physiology;23,Pagination 751-761en_US
dc.subjectbiomass allocationen_US
dc.titleThe association of biomass allocation with growth and water use efficiency of two Triticum aestivum cultivarsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1996-01-01en_US
dcterms.extent751-761en_US
dcterms.issued1996-01-01en_US

Files