Leaf development and phenology of Triticum aestivum and T. durum under different moisture regimes

cg.contactunknown505@unknown.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00010492en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0032-079Xen_US
cg.issn1573-5036en_US
cg.journalPlant and Soilen_US
cg.subject.agrovocphyllochronen_US
cg.subject.agrovoctriticum aestivumen_US
cg.subject.agrovocanthesisen_US
cg.subject.agrovocDurum Wheaten_US
cg.volume170en_US
dc.contributorOrtiz-Ferrara, G.en_US
dc.contributorMahalakshmi, V.en_US
dc.contributorHamblin, Johnen_US
dc.creatorMosaad, M. G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-12T22:56:51Z
dc.date.available2021-07-12T22:56:51Z
dc.description.abstractWheat grain yield production in the rain-fed areas is limited by water deficits during crop growth. A greenhouse experiment was conducted during spring 1992 at ICARDA, Tel Hadya, Syria, with eight genotypes representing two Triticum species (Triticum turgidum var. durum and Triticum aestivum L.) under four soil-moisture regimes (95%, 75%, 55%, and 35% field capacity) to study the effect of water deficit on leaf development. The phyllochron was similar in the two species across the watering regimes. The range in variation in phyllochron among the genotypes was similar in the two species. Phyllochron response to water stress among genotypes was distinct in the driest regime in both species. Cham 6 (T aestivum) and Gallareta (T. turgidum var. durum) had similar phyllochron across all moisture regimes whereas in other genotypes phyllochron was higher in the driest regime. Leaf area decreased with increasing moisture stress. Triticum turgidum var. durum genotypes were later in flowering as they had, on average, one leaf more than Triticum aestivum genotypes with similar leaf appearance rates.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationM. G. Mosaad, G. Ortiz-Ferrara, V. Mahalakshmi, John Hamblin. (1/3/1995). Leaf development and phenology of Triticum aestivum and T. durum under different moisture regimes. Plant and Soil, 170, pp. 377-381.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/13379
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer (part of Springer Nature)en_US
dc.sourcePlant and Soil;170,(1995) Pagination 377-381en_US
dc.subjecttriticum turgidum var. durumen_US
dc.subjectflag leaf areaen_US
dc.subjectnumber of leavesen_US
dc.titleLeaf development and phenology of Triticum aestivum and T. durum under different moisture regimesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1995-03-01en_US
dcterms.extent377-381en_US
mel.impact-factor4.192en_US

Files