Multi environment evaluation of chickpea disease nurseries (wilt, Aschochyta blight and Botrytis grey mold) to identify stable and new sources of resistance

cg.contactmamta.sharma@CGIAR.ORGen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics - ICRISATen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Grain Legumes - GLen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
cg.coverage.countryETen_US
cg.coverage.countryGHen_US
cg.coverage.countryINen_US
cg.coverage.countryMAen_US
cg.coverage.countryNGen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Asiaen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Africaen_US
cg.creator.idMamta, Sharma: 0000-0001-5745-4693en_US
cg.subject.agrovocenvironmenten_US
cg.subject.agrovocevaluationen_US
dc.creatorMamta, Sharmaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-27T13:54:32Z
dc.date.available2017-02-27T13:54:32Z
dc.description.abstractUnder the ICRISAT- ICAR collaboration, disease nurseries of wilt (ICWN), AB (IABN) and BGM (IBGMN) consisting of 30 entries (28 resistant cultivars and 2 susceptible checks) were evaluated at different locations (hot spots) in India. ICWN was sent to 10 hot-spot locations, IABN to 4 locations (Gurdaspur, Dhaulakuan ICRISAT and Ludhiana) and IBGMN to 4 locations (Gurdaspur, ICRISAT, Ludhiana and Pantnagar) in India. Each entry was planted in one row of 4 m long and replicated twice. The respective susceptible cultivars were planted after every four test entries in all locations. Additionally, all co-operators included a susceptible check of the local area as test entries for proper comparison. Application of fertilizer, insecticide and other cultural practices were followed as per the local practices. Wherever possible, co-operators planted the nursery in sick plot or in the area where the disease commonly observed every year. Information on planting date, season’s rainfall, irrigation, fertilizer application and insecticides used was provided by co-operators in the prescribed format provided in the data record books. Data on disease incidence was recorded thrice at seedling, flowering, and at maturity stages of the crop.en_US
dc.formatDOCXen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/g5WIFkar/v/c7d429ec28ae385103d2647c5d2835d0en_US
dc.identifier.citationSharma Mamta. (27/2/2017). Multi environment evaluation of chickpea disease nurseries (wilt, Aschochyta blight and Botrytis grey mold) to identify stable and new sources of resistance.en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/6050
dc.languageenen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.subjectChickpeaen_US
dc.titleMulti environment evaluation of chickpea disease nurseries (wilt, Aschochyta blight and Botrytis grey mold) to identify stable and new sources of resistanceen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
dcterms.available2017-02-27en_US

Files