Irrigation and soil management strategies for usingsaline-sodic water in a cotton–wheat rotation

cg.contactgmurtazauaf@gmail.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Institute of Soil & Environmental Sciences - UAF - FoA - IoSESen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.03.003en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0378-3774en_US
cg.issue1-2en_US
cg.journalAgricultural Water Managementen_US
cg.subject.agrovoccrop productionen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsalinityen_US
cg.subject.agrovocgypsumen_US
cg.volume81en_US
dc.contributorGhafoor, Abdulen_US
dc.contributorQadir, Manzooren_US
dc.creatorMurtaza, Ghulamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-25T22:41:44Z
dc.date.available2021-11-25T22:41:44Z
dc.description.abstractConsequent to population growth and high living standards in several and and semi-arid regions, competition for freshwater among different water-use sectors is expected to increase vis-a-vis its decreased allocation to irrigation. Non-conventional water resources, such as saline and/or sodic drainage and groundwater represent complementary supply to narrow the gap between freshwater availability and demand. We carried out a 3-year field study in the Indus Plains of Pakistan to evaluate different irrigation and soil management strategies for using saline-sodic water to grow cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on a sandy loam soil (ECe = 1.3-1.76 dS m(-1), pH(s) = 8.47-8.61, SAR = 5.50-7.41, infiltration rate = 0.6-0.8 cm h(-1), p(b) = 1.56-1.61 Mg m(-3)). The treatments were: (1) irrigation with freshwater from a nearby canal (FW); (2) irrigation with saline-sodic water (EC = 3.32 dS m(-1), SAR = 16.29, SAR(adj) = 18.24, RSC = 5.25 mmol(c) L-1) (SSW); (3) cyclic use of fresh and saline-sodic water through alternate irrigations (FW - SSW); (4) Soil application of farm manure at 25 Mg ha(-1) year(-1) and irrigation with saline-sodic water (FM + SSW); and (5) soil application of gypsum equivalent to gypsum requirement of saline-sodic water and irrigation with the same water (G + SSW). The seed yield of first cotton crop was not significantly affected by different treatments. The yields of subsequent wheat and cotton crops were lower in the SSW than other treatments, indicating negative impacts of saline-sodic water when used in the absence of a soil or irrigation management approach. The treatments using saline-sodic water did increase soil ECe and SAR levels, but this increase was only significant in SSW treatment. Irrigation with saline-sodic water together with amendments significantly increased infiltration rate than SSW alone, where bulk density was increased. The net benefit was the maximum from FW - SSW treatment followed by FW, G + SSW, FM + SSW and SSW. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationGhulam Murtaza, Abdul Ghafoor, Manzoor Qadir. (10/3/2006). Irrigation and soil management strategies for usingsaline-sodic water in a cotton–wheat rotation. Agricultural Water Management, 81 (1-2), pp. 98-114.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/66475
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier (12 months)en_US
dc.sourceAgricultural Water Management;81,(2005) Pagination 98-114en_US
dc.subjectsodicityen_US
dc.subjectfarm manureen_US
dc.titleIrrigation and soil management strategies for usingsaline-sodic water in a cotton–wheat rotationen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2005-04-28en_US
dcterms.extent98-114en_US
dcterms.issued2006-03-10en_US
mel.impact-factor4.516en_US

Files