Simultaneous adoption of integrated soil fertility management technologies in the Chinyanja Triangle, Southern Africa

cg.contactp.mponela@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIATen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Grain Legumes and Dryland Cereals - GLDCen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIATen_US
cg.contributor.funderUnited States Agency for International Development - USAIDen_US
cg.contributor.funderBill & Melinda Gates Foundation - BMGFen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.creator.idMponela, Powell: 0000-0003-4269-0663en_US
cg.creator.idKassie, Girma: 0000-0001-7430-4291en_US
cg.creator.idTamene, Lulseged: 0000-0002-3806-8890en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12155en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0165-0203en_US
cg.issue3en_US
cg.journalNatural Resources Forumen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclearningen_US
cg.subject.agrovocintegrated soil fertility managementen_US
cg.volume42en_US
dc.contributorKassie, Girmaen_US
dc.contributorTamene, Lulsegeden_US
dc.creatorMponela, Powellen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-10T16:22:17Z
dc.date.available2019-03-10T16:22:17Z
dc.description.abstractEmpirical scientific evidence indicates that there is still room for increasing food production by improving land productivity. This study aimed at identifying the key determinants that govern farmers’ decisions to adopt multiple components of integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) in a maize mixed cropping system of the Chinyanja Triangle, Southern Africa. Revealed preferences of ISFM components were collected from 320 randomly selected households and multivariate probit (MVP) model was used to analyse the simultaneous effects on adoption based on biophysical plot and household‐level socioeconomic attributes. The results show that farmers’ choices of a set of ISFM components are determined by a mix of factors that address the trade‐offs and synergies among them. Non‐farm income, moderate land quality perception, and education influence simultaneous technology adoption, while gender and crop loss increase the likelihood of farmers’ decisions to adopt independent options. Having other sources of income supports co‐adoption of inorganic fertilizer, residue incorporation, and crop rotation. Input/output market access, access to information, financial sources, and climate variability also play pivotal role in technology adoption. These results indicate that resource availability, learning costs, finances, and risk aversion need to be considered when designing and promoting ISFM technologies as a package.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/1deedb7a4e55c6e8842d3517d0ef2437/v/7a43e900f8d2b1b0eefaa6e82adb1a94en_US
dc.identifier.citationPowell Mponela, Girma Kassie, Lulseged Tamene. (16/8/2018). Simultaneous adoption of integrated soil fertility management technologies in the Chinyanja Triangle, Southern Africa. Natural Resources Forum, 42 (3), pp. 172-184.en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/9629
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherWiley (12 months)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceNatural Resources Forum;42,(2018) Pagination 172-184en_US
dc.subjectchinyanja triangleen_US
dc.subjectsimultaneous adoptionen_US
dc.subjectresource scarcityen_US
dc.subjectrisk aversionen_US
dc.titleSimultaneous adoption of integrated soil fertility management technologies in the Chinyanja Triangle, Southern Africaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2018-08-16en_US
dcterms.extent172-184en_US
mel.impact-factor0.742en_US

Files