Comparison of conservation tillage systems in barley-based cropping systems in Northern Syria

cg.contactMikeJ.Jones@BTInternet.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countrySYen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700361026en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0014-4797en_US
cg.issn1469-4441en_US
cg.issue1en_US
cg.journalExperimental Agricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocbarleyen_US
cg.subject.agrovochordeum vulgareen_US
cg.subject.agrovocBarleyen_US
cg.volume36en_US
dc.creatorJones, Michaelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-24T22:54:16Z
dc.date.available2021-11-24T22:54:16Z
dc.description.abstractYields of rainfed barley (Hordeum vulgare) for feed and forage in small-ruminant production systems in low-rainfall areas of North Africa and West Asia are limited by low and erratic water availability. Therefore, the testing of conservation farming techniques, effective in dryland systems elsewhere, is often suggested. Seven-year results from a typical site in northern Syria showed that zero-till (direct-drill) systems with cereal residue retention may marginally enhance soil moisture status, but the yield effect on barley, either monocropped or rotated with vetch (Vicia sativa), was small and non-significant. In the vetch–barley rotation, a small and fairly consistent benefit to vetch was observed, amounting to a 20% yield increase in vetch hay. Given smallholders' strong preference for barley and reluctance to grow vetch as an alternate crop, there is little in this result to encourage the promotion of zero-till conservation techniques in these farming systems.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationMichael Jones. (1/1/2000). Comparison of conservation tillage systems in barley-based cropping systems in Northern Syria. Experimental Agriculture, 36 (1), pp. 15-26.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/66462
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_US
dc.sourceExperimental Agriculture;36,(2000) Pagination 15-26en_US
dc.titleComparison of conservation tillage systems in barley-based cropping systems in Northern Syriaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2000-01-01en_US
dcterms.extent15-26en_US
mel.impact-factor2.118en_US

Files