Measuring trust and commitment in collective actions: Evidence from farmers’ marketing organizations in rural Ethiopia

cg.contactg.tadesse@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Food Policy Research Institute - IFPRIen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.creator.idKassie, Girma: 0000-0001-7430-4291en_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-09-2015-0253en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0306-8293en_US
cg.issue7en_US
cg.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICSen_US
cg.subject.agrovoccooperativesen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsocial capitalen_US
cg.subject.agrovoccollective actionen_US
cg.volume44en_US
dc.contributorKassie, Girmaen_US
dc.creatorTadesse, Getawen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-22T23:12:23Z
dc.date.available2021-06-22T23:12:23Z
dc.description.abstractPurpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the theoretical and empirical possibility of measuring trust and commitment in collective actions. Design/methodology/approach The study employs choice experiments to estimate trust implicitly as opposed to the common practice of measuring trust explicitly. Several experiments were conducted to assess members’ level of trust and commitment to marketing cooperatives in rural Ethiopia. Findings The results of the study indicate that significant number of farmers do not yet have trust in their organization and fellow members in both absolute and relative terms. The probability of trust increases when members actively participate in cooperative governance, are less diverse, stay longer in the cooperative, and when cooperatives are older. The authors also learnt that both trust and commitment have indeed improved the performance of farmers’ market organizations. Trust in cooperative is asymmetrically sensitive to incentives and disincentives. Research limitations/implications The study implied that research efforts attempting to estimate trust in collective action shall use an implicit measurement and consider the sensitivity of trust to relativeness, incentives and types of transactions. Practical implications The findings of this study showed that rural organizations that are established with external help, such as agricultural cooperatives in Africa, seem to struggle to earn the trust of their current and potential members. This implies that given the effectiveness and persistence of informal rural organizations emerged through mutual trust, cooperatives must be organized either through informal ways as trust-based organizations or based on cooperative business principles of voluntarism and independence. Originality/value This paper employs the behaviorally appealing choice experiment approach to capture the different aspects of trust such as relativism, sensitivity of trust to incentive and types of transactions in smallholder producers’ organizations.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationGetaw Tadesse, Girma Kassie. (10/7/2017). Measuring trust and commitment in collective actions: Evidence from farmers’ marketing organizations in rural Ethiopia. International Journal of Social Economics, 44 (7), pp. 980-996.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/13270
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherEmeralden_US
dc.sourceINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS;44,(2017) Pagination 980-996en_US
dc.subjectchoice experimenten_US
dc.subjecttrusten_US
dc.titleMeasuring trust and commitment in collective actions: Evidence from farmers’ marketing organizations in rural Ethiopiaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2017-07-10en_US
dcterms.extent980-996en_US

Files