Sustainability and Economic Viability of Cereals Grown Under Alternative Treatments of Water-Harvesting in Highland Balochistan, Pakistan

cg.contactunknown123@unknown123.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J064v08n01_07en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn2168-3573en_US
cg.issue1en_US
cg.journalAgroecology and Sustainable Food Systemsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsustainabilityen_US
cg.subject.agrovocpakistanen_US
cg.subject.agrovoceconomic viabilityen_US
cg.volume8en_US
dc.creatorRodriguez, Abelardoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-09T00:49:50Z
dc.date.available2021-03-09T00:49:50Z
dc.description.abstractRainfed crop production in highland Balochistan, Pakistan, is a limited and risky practice due to a wide variation in rainfall. To ascertain the sustainability and economic viability of wheat and barley cultivation under three different water-harvesting treatments, intertemporal and interspatial total factor productivity (TFP) indices respectively were used. In the traditional practice treatment the entire plot is planted. In the 1:1 treatment half the plot is used for water catchment and half is planted; in the 2:1 treatment, two-thirds of the plot is used for water catchment and one-third for planting. Intertemporal TFPs had large fluctuations in both cereals; they were used to determine the slopes of TFP trends, but the assessment of sustainability was unreliable owing to a low number of measurements. Interspatial TFPs showed that wheat under the 1:1 treatment and barley under the 2:1 treatment were the most economically viable. Comparison of crops within a given water-harvesting treatment showed that barley was more productive than wheat under traditional practice and that wheat was more viable than barley under the 1:1 treatment.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationAbelardo Rodriguez. (12/10/2008). Sustainability and Economic Viability of Cereals Grown Under Alternative Treatments of Water-Harvesting in Highland Balochistan, Pakistan. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 8 (1), pp. 47-59.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12638
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.sourceAgroecology and Sustainable Food Systems;8,(2008) Pagination 47-59en_US
dc.subjecttotal factor productivityen_US
dc.titleSustainability and Economic Viability of Cereals Grown Under Alternative Treatments of Water-Harvesting in Highland Balochistan, Pakistanen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2008-10-12en_US
dcterms.extent47-59en_US
dcterms.issued1996-01-01en_US
mel.impact-factor1.636en_US

Files