Sustainability and Economic Viability of Cereals Grown Under Alternative Treatments of Water-Harvesting in Highland Balochistan, Pakistan
cg.contact | unknown123@unknown123.com | en_US |
cg.contributor.center | International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDA | en_US |
cg.contributor.funder | International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDA | en_US |
cg.contributor.project | Communication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS) | en_US |
cg.contributor.project-lead-institute | International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDA | en_US |
cg.date.embargo-end-date | Timeless | en_US |
cg.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J064v08n01_07 | en_US |
cg.isijournal | ISI Journal | en_US |
cg.issn | 2168-3573 | en_US |
cg.issue | 1 | en_US |
cg.journal | Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems | en_US |
cg.subject.agrovoc | sustainability | en_US |
cg.subject.agrovoc | pakistan | en_US |
cg.subject.agrovoc | economic viability | en_US |
cg.volume | 8 | en_US |
dc.creator | Rodriguez, Abelardo | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-09T00:49:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-09T00:49:50Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Rainfed crop production in highland Balochistan, Pakistan, is a limited and risky practice due to a wide variation in rainfall. To ascertain the sustainability and economic viability of wheat and barley cultivation under three different water-harvesting treatments, intertemporal and interspatial total factor productivity (TFP) indices respectively were used. In the traditional practice treatment the entire plot is planted. In the 1:1 treatment half the plot is used for water catchment and half is planted; in the 2:1 treatment, two-thirds of the plot is used for water catchment and one-third for planting. Intertemporal TFPs had large fluctuations in both cereals; they were used to determine the slopes of TFP trends, but the assessment of sustainability was unreliable owing to a low number of measurements. Interspatial TFPs showed that wheat under the 1:1 treatment and barley under the 2:1 treatment were the most economically viable. Comparison of crops within a given water-harvesting treatment showed that barley was more productive than wheat under traditional practice and that wheat was more viable than barley under the 1:1 treatment. | en_US |
dc.identifier | https://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limited | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Abelardo Rodriguez. (12/10/2008). Sustainability and Economic Viability of Cereals Grown Under Alternative Treatments of Water-Harvesting in Highland Balochistan, Pakistan. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 8 (1), pp. 47-59. | en_US |
dc.identifier.status | Timeless limited access | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12638 | |
dc.language | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis | en_US |
dc.source | Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems;8,(2008) Pagination 47-59 | en_US |
dc.subject | total factor productivity | en_US |
dc.title | Sustainability and Economic Viability of Cereals Grown Under Alternative Treatments of Water-Harvesting in Highland Balochistan, Pakistan | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_US |
dcterms.available | 2008-10-12 | en_US |
dcterms.extent | 47-59 | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 1996-01-01 | en_US |
mel.impact-factor | 1.636 | en_US |