Long-term yield patterns in barley-based cropping systems in Northern Syria. 2. The role of feed legumes

cg.contactunkown19@unknown.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countrySYen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859699008199en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0021-8596en_US
cg.issn1469-5146en_US
cg.issue3en_US
cg.journalJournal of Agricultural Scienceen_US
cg.subject.agrovocnitrogenen_US
cg.subject.agrovocnitrogen fertilizersen_US
cg.subject.agrovocBarleyen_US
cg.volume135en_US
dc.contributorSingh, M.en_US
dc.creatorJones, M. J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-26T22:43:25Z
dc.date.available2021-10-26T22:43:25Z
dc.description.abstractRotations of barley with feed legumes produce more biomass and crude protein than barley-fallow and continuous barley sequences, but scope remains to improve the potential value to farmers of feed legume-based systems. This gaper summarizes B-year results from two sites from 2-year rotations of barley with: narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis) and lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus), each harvested mature; and common vetch (Vicia sativa). harvested by simulated green-grazing and mature, all in factorial combination with four NP fertilizer regimes applied biennially to the barley. Mean yield differences between rotations were quite small. but at the drier site the narbon vetch rotation was significantly superior in both total biomass and crop total nitrogen. Other results implied yield compensation between barley and legume phases: barley performance was relatively depressed at the wetter site after high-yielding narbon vetch but was relatively enhanced at both sites after green-grazed common vetch. Evidence from year-round soil-water monitoring suggests that the benefit following green grazing may have arisen, in part, from a small carry-over of profile moisture between crops not much inferior to that residual from a fallow year. Both crop phases responded strongly to biennial P fertilizer; and barley responded strongly to three rates of N-fertilizer, but a sometimes significant curvilinear component to this response reflected a tendency for grain yields to be depressed by added nitrogen in the driest years. But interactions between N-rates and rotations were not significant. It was concluded that narbon vetch may have greater potential than common vetch and lathyrus for mature harvest in drier areas, but its unsuitability for grazing green is a limitation. Flexibility of utilization is important, to accommodate the needs of different farmers and the exigencies of different seasons. The green-graze option has major potential where there is a demand for high-quality spring grazing; and indications that barley may be as productive after green-grazed vetch as after a year of fallow suggest an alternative approach for farmers who have previously avoided legumes in order to maximize barley production.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationM. J. Jones, M. Singh. (16/11/2000). Long-term yield patterns in barley-based cropping systems in Northern Syria. 2. The role of feed legumes. Journal of Agricultural Science, 135 (3), pp. 237 -249.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/66297
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_US
dc.sourceJournal of Agricultural Science;135,Pagination 237 -249en_US
dc.titleLong-term yield patterns in barley-based cropping systems in Northern Syria. 2. The role of feed legumesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2000-11-16en_US
dcterms.extent237 -249en_US
dcterms.issued2000-11-16en_US
mel.impact-factor1.476en_US

Files