Institutional Change in the Syrian Rangelands

cg.contactt.ngaido@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of Aleppoen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countrySYen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2001.mp32004008.xen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn1759-5436en_US
cg.issue4en_US
cg.journalIDS bulletinen_US
cg.subject.agrovocrangelandsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsyriaen_US
cg.volume32en_US
dc.contributorShomo, Farouken_US
dc.contributorArab, Georgesen_US
dc.creatorNgaido, Tidianeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-21T17:31:59Z
dc.date.available2023-06-21T17:31:59Z
dc.description.abstractDuring the past forty years, the Syrian rangelands have been the focal point of government interventions. These had four major components: assertion of state ownership over rangelands, settlement and transformation of herders into farmers, formal reorganization of the Bedouin population into range improvement and sheep husbandry cooperatives, and development of rangeland reserves. Each of these interventions has had many implications for livestock production, on rangeland management as well as on the livelihood strategies of herding households and communities. In 1994, the Syrian government took a major decision by banning cultivation in rangelands and committed itself to enhancing livestock production through better conservation, improvement and management of rangeland resources. The ban on cultivation, which is transforming sheep production systems and livelihood strategies of herding communities, is forcing herding communities to devise new strategies for overcoming their production constraints. Under present range conditions, it is clear that herding communities cannot stay there all year round and have, necessarily, to seek alternative feed resources. This article asks the questions: are herding communities likely to revert to old Bedouin livestock production systems based on trans‐humance and reciprocity or will they opt to use more individualistic and market‐based feed resources? Are feed access strategies differentiated by livestock ownership? How will these changes affect their production systems and livelihood strategies?en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationTidiane Ngaido, Farouk Shomo, Georges Arab. (22/5/2009). Institutional Change in the Syrian Rangelands. IDS bulletin, 32 (4), pp. 64-70.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/68501
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.sourceIDS bulletin;32,(2009) Pagination 64-70en_US
dc.titleInstitutional Change in the Syrian Rangelandsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2009-05-22en_US
dcterms.extent64-70en_US

Files