Sources of Resistance to Common Bunt (Tilletia foetida and T. caries) in Durum Wheat

cg.contactunknown123@unknown1234.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1994.tb04522.xen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0931-1785en_US
cg.issn1439-0434en_US
cg.issue2en_US
cg.journalJournal of Phytopathologyen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdurum (triticum durum)en_US
cg.subject.agrovoctilletia foetidaen_US
cg.subject.agrovocDurum Wheaten_US
cg.volume142en_US
dc.contributorMiloudi, Nachiten_US
dc.creatorMamluk, O. F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-02T23:51:24Z
dc.date.available2021-12-02T23:51:24Z
dc.description.abstractScreening of durum wheat germplasm for resistance to common bunt (Tilletia foetida and T. caries) resulted in the identification of 26 resistant genotypes. The screening was made using nine common bunt isolates from the West Asia and North Africa (WANA) region. In one isolate the two pathogens were represented in ratio of 1:1, whereas eight isolates contained only T. foetida. The correlation, principal components and clustering analyses grouped the genotypes into three clusters., Cluster one comparised genotypes close to Senatore (S.) Cappelli and Haurani, the latter is a landrace from Syria. Cluster three comprised advanced genotypes containing resistance genes from Mindum, a Turkish landrace. Results indicated that donor sources of resistance appear to be related to the three major sources mentioned. Cultivar S. Cappelli is considered resistant since it has been grown by farmers on a large scale for many years and remained resistant to common bunt throughout 7 years of testing. This resistance is assumed to be of a durable type. The isolates were also grouped into three clusters representing different ecological areas and the wheat types from which the isolates originated. We infer that the different clusters reflect the presence of three pathotype groups of the pathogens.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationO. F. Mamluk, Nachit Miloudi. (1/10/1994). Sources of Resistance to Common Bunt (Tilletia foetida and T. caries) in Durum Wheat. Journal of Phytopathology, 142 (2), pp. 122-130.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/66519
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherWiley (12 months)en_US
dc.sourceJournal of Phytopathology;142,(1994) Pagination 122-130en_US
dc.titleSources of Resistance to Common Bunt (Tilletia foetida and T. caries) in Durum Wheaten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1994-10-01en_US
dcterms.extent122-130en_US
mel.impact-factor1.789en_US

Files