Differences in developmental plasticity and growth rate among drought-resistant and susceptible cultivars of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum)

cg.contactpaul.struik@wur.nlen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerWageningen University & Research Centre - WURen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00011044en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0032-079Xen_US
cg.issn1573-5036en_US
cg.journalPlant and Soilen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdurum (triticum durum)en_US
cg.subject.agrovocDurum Wheaten_US
cg.volume157en_US
dc.contributorPeacock, John M.en_US
dc.contributorStruik, Paul C.en_US
dc.creatorSimane, B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-22T23:24:28Z
dc.date.available2021-04-22T23:24:28Z
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding how growth and development of durum wheat cultivars respond to drought could provide a basis to develop crop improvement programmes in drought-affected tropical and subtropical countries. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to study the responses of five durum wheat cultivars to moisture stress at different developmental phases. Phenology, total dry matter (TDM), relative growth rate (RGR), leaf area ratio (LAR), net assimilation rate (NAR), leaf weight ratio (LWR), specific leaf area (SLA) and shoot:root ratio were compared. Pre-anthesis moisture stress delayed phenological development, whereas post-anthesis moisture stress accelerated it. TDM accumulation rate was different between drought-resistant and susceptible cultivars. RGR and its components changed with age and moisture availability. Drought-resistant cultivars had a high RGR in favourable periods of the growing season and a low RGR during moisture stress. In contrast, the drought-susceptible cultivar (Po) showed an opposite trend. LAR explained the differences in RGR (r=0.788) best, whereas the relationship between NAR and RGR was not significant. Even though both LWR and SLA were important factors determining the potential growth rate, LWR was of major importance to describe cultivar differences in LAR, and consequently in RGR. The drought-resistant cultivars Omrabi-5 and Boohai showed vigorous root development and/or a low shoot:root ratio. It is concluded that biomass allocation is the major factor explaining variation in RGR among the investigated durum wheat cultivars.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationB. Simane, John M. Peacock, Paul C. Struik. (1/12/1993). Differences in developmental plasticity and growth rate among drought-resistant and susceptible cultivars of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum). Plant and Soil, 157, pp. 155-166.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12923
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer (part of Springer Nature)en_US
dc.sourcePlant and Soil;157,(1993) Pagination 155-166en_US
dc.subjectrelative growth rateen_US
dc.subjectmoisture stressen_US
dc.subjectleaf area ratioen_US
dc.subjectnet assimilation rateen_US
dc.subjectdevelopmental plasticityen_US
dc.subjectshoot root ratioen_US
dc.titleDifferences in developmental plasticity and growth rate among drought-resistant and susceptible cultivars of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum)en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1993-12-01en_US
dcterms.extent155-166en_US
mel.impact-factor3.299en_US

Files