Bayesian Estimation of Genotypes Means, Precision, and Genetic Gain Due to Selection from Routinely Used Barley Trials

cg.contactM.SINGH@CGIAR.ORGen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.creator.idSingh, Murari: 0000-0001-5450-0949en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.02.0111en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0011-183Xen_US
cg.issue2en_US
cg.journalCrop Scienceen_US
cg.subject.agrovocgenotypesen_US
cg.subject.agrovocBarleyen_US
cg.volume55en_US
dc.contributorAl-Yassin, Adnanen_US
dc.contributorOmer, Siraj Osmanen_US
dc.creatorSingh, Murarien_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-20T19:58:59Z
dc.date.available2020-11-20T19:58:59Z
dc.description.abstractBlock designs are normally used in evaluation of crop varieties. The responses or yield data arising from designed trials in a crop variety improvement program are generally analyzed using linear mixed models under the frequentist paradigm. Such analysis ignores information on the genotypic parameters available from previous similar trials. Another approach with a relatively wider inferential framework is Bayesian, which integrates the prior information with the likelihood of current data. While the Bayesian approach has been implemented in numerous situations, stepwise presentation of its application in routine crop variety trials is not available. Illustrated with a dataset from a resolvable incomplete block design, this study provides a working tool for Bayesian analysis based on priors available from a series of crop variety trials. The posterior estimates of predicted values of mean of genotypes and precision, coefficient of variation, heritability, and genetic gain due to selection were obtained. The a posteriori mean of experimental error variance, coefficient of variation, and genotypic variance were lower for the Bayesian than the frequentist approach. The precision of a posteriori means was higher than that of predicted means under the frequentist approach. Accounting for incomplete blocks, rather than ignoring them, using a Bayesian approach showed a large reduction in estimates of error variance components and large increases in heritability and genetic gain. The current a posteriori distributions also serve as updated priors for future analysis. The step-by-step procedure presented here is recommended for routine analysis of variety trials.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/3a51b9adfdd1f02ea8eea076c0f61b81/v/763977eae4ead64db6eb9ffff2251029en_US
dc.identifier.citationMurari Singh, Adnan Al-Yassin, Siraj Osman Omer. (1/4/2015). Bayesian Estimation of Genotypes Means, Precision, and Genetic Gain Due to Selection from Routinely Used Barley Trials. Crop Science, 55 (2), pp. 501-513.en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12069
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCrop Science Society of Americaen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-ND-4.0en_US
dc.sourceCrop Science;55,(2014) Pagination 501-513en_US
dc.subjectbayesian estimationen_US
dc.titleBayesian Estimation of Genotypes Means, Precision, and Genetic Gain Due to Selection from Routinely Used Barley Trialsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2014-12-31en_US
dcterms.extent501-513en_US
dcterms.issued2015-04-01en_US
mel.impact-factor1.878en_US

Files