Water balances and evapotranspiration in water and dry‐seeded rice systems

cg.contactbalinquist@ucdavis.eduen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUniversity of California-Davis - UC Davisen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countryUSen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Americaen_US
cg.creator.idSwelam, Atef: 0000-0002-5220-9901en_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2017-08-08en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-015-0474-4en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn1432-1319en_US
cg.journalIrrigation Scienceen_US
cg.subject.agrovoccropsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwater managementen_US
cg.subject.agrovocproduction systemsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocriceen_US
cg.volume33en_US
dc.contributorHill, Jimen_US
dc.contributorSwelam, Atefen_US
dc.creatorLinquist, Bruceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-23T12:58:17Z
dc.date.available2017-02-23T12:58:17Z
dc.description.abstractRice is a crop that is usually grown under flooded conditions and can require large amounts of water. The objective of this 3-year study was to quantify water use in water- (WS) and dry-seeded (DS) systems. In WS systems, the field is continuously flooded, while in DS systems the field is flush irrigated for the first month and then flooded. Research was conducted on commercial rice fields where the residual of the energy balance method using a sonic anemometer and the eddy covariance method were used to determine crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and crop coefficient (Kc) values. In addition, inlet irrigation water and tailwater drainage were determined. Across years, there was no difference in ETc (averaged 862 mm), sea- sonal Kc (averaged 1.07), irrigation water delivery (aver- aged 1839 mm) and calculated percolation and seepage losses (averaged 269 mm) between systems. An analysis of the first month of the season, when the water management between these two practices was different, indicated that Kc and water use were lower in DS systems relative to WS systems when there was only one irrigation flush during this period, while two or three irrigation flushes resulted in similar values between the two systems.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/RehjXs7o/v/19056507e2038d4ee379ebb5ae7249cben_US
dc.identifier.citationBruce Linquist, Jim Hill, Atef Swelam. (9/8/2015). Water balances and evapotranspiration in water and dry‐seeded rice systems. Irrigation Science, 33, pp. 375-385.en_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/5899
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag (Germany)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceIrrigation Science;33,(2015) Pagination 375-385en_US
dc.titleWater balances and evapotranspiration in water and dry‐seeded rice systemsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2015-08-09en_US
dcterms.extent375-385en_US
mel.impact-factor1.948en_US

Files