Time trends in crop yields in long-term trials

cg.contactunkown19@unknown.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700002027en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0014-4797en_US
cg.issn1469-4441en_US
cg.issue2en_US
cg.journalExperimental Agricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocbarleyen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsyriaen_US
cg.volume36en_US
dc.contributorSingh, M.en_US
dc.creatorJones, M. J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-21T20:39:31Z
dc.date.available2021-10-21T20:39:31Z
dc.description.abstractTrends over time in annual crop yields potentially provide measures of the likely long-term sustainability of cropping systems. However, where large annual variability in the growth environment is responsible for most of the large year-to-year yield differences, appropriate analytical techniques must be developed to distinguish real long-term trends from the 'back-ground noise'. This paper presents models for the estimation of time trends in the yield data from crop rotation systems and discusses the results of applying these models to yield values from two types of long-term trial involving barley, each conducted at two sites in northern Syria. The models used were linear with respect to time (years) and allowed for seasonal effects by means of a quadratic relationship on total rainfall and a linear relationship on planting date. A more complex model might account for more of the variance, but restrictions were imposed by the limited number of degrees of freedom (number of years of data less one) and the choice of meaningful single-valued parameters of growth-season conditions. For many experimental treatments the model accounted for less of the total variance at the wetter site. This may be due to seasonal bufferring by soil moisture stored at depth from one year to the next, and future iterations of the analysis will try to allow for this. The appropriateness of the linear time function is also questioned, and alternative functions will be tested along with alternative structures for plot errors over time.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationM. J. Jones, M. Singh. (1/4/2000). Time trends in crop yields in long-term trials. Experimental Agriculture, 36 (2), pp. 165-179.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/66263
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_US
dc.sourceExperimental Agriculture;36,Pagination 165-179en_US
dc.titleTime trends in crop yields in long-term trialsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2000-04-01en_US
dcterms.extent165-179en_US
dcterms.issued2000-04-01en_US
mel.impact-factor2.118en_US

Files