Economic trade-offs of biomass use in crop-livestock systems: Exploring more sustainable options in semi-arid Zimbabwe

cg.contacts.homann@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics - ICRISATen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.centerWorld Agroforestry Center - ICRAFen_US
cg.contributor.centerWageningen University & Research Centre - WURen_US
cg.contributor.centerMinistry of Agriculture, Mechanization and Irrigation Development, Department of Research and Specialist Services, Matopos Research Institute - DRSS - MRIen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderNot Applicableen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countryZWen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.creator.idValbuena, Diego: 0000-0002-8651-1455en_US
cg.creator.idDescheemaeker, Katrien: 0000-0003-0184-2034en_US
cg.creator.idClaessens, Lieven: 0000-0003-2961-8990en_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2017-07-26en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.06.009en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0308-521Xen_US
cg.journalAgricultural Systemsen_US
cg.subject.agrovoccrop residuesen_US
cg.subject.agrovoccropsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocfarming systemsen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclivestocken_US
cg.subject.agrovocmarketsen_US
cg.subject.agrovoctradeen_US
cg.subject.agrovocmixed farmingen_US
cg.subject.agrovoczimbabween_US
cg.volume134en_US
dc.contributorValbuena, Diegoen_US
dc.contributorMasikati, Patriciaen_US
dc.contributorDescheemaeker, Katrienen_US
dc.contributorNyamangara, Justiceen_US
dc.contributorClaessens, Lievenen_US
dc.contributorErenstein, Olafen_US
dc.contributorvan Rooyen, Andreen_US
dc.contributorNkomboni, Danielen_US
dc.creatorHomann-Kee Tui, Sabineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-20T11:15:59Z
dc.date.available2016-09-20T11:15:59Z
dc.description.abstractIn complex mixed crop-livestock systems with limited resources and biomass scarcity, crop residues play an important but increasingly contested role. This paper focuses on farming systems in the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe, where biomass production is limited and farmers integrate crop and livestock activities. Conservation Agriculture (CA) is promoted to intensify crop production, emphasizing the retention of surface mulch with crop residues (CR). This paper quantifies the associated potential economic trade-offs and profitability of using residues for soil amendment or as livestock feed, and explores alternative biomass production options. We draw on household surveys, stakeholder feedback, crop, livestock and economic modeling tools. We use the Trade-Off Analysis Model for Multi Dimensional Impact Assessment (TOA-MD) to compare different CR use scenarios at community level and for different farm types: particularly the current base system (cattle grazing of maize residues) and sustainable intensification alternatives based on a CA option (mulching using maize residues ± inorganic fertilizer) and a maize–mucuna (Mucuna pruriens) rotation. Our results indicate that a maize–mucuna rotation can reduce trade-offs between CR uses for feed and mulch, providing locally available organic soil enhancement, supplementary feed and a potential source of income. Conservation Agriculture without fertilizer application and at non-subsidized fertilizer prices is not financially viable; whereas with subsidized fertilizer it can benefit half the farm population. The poverty effects of all considered alternative biomass options are however limited; they do not raise income sufficiently to lift farmers out of poverty. Further research is needed to establish the competitiveness of alternative biomass enhancing technologies and the socio-economic processes that can facilitate sustainable intensification of mixed crop-livestock systems, particularly in semi-arid environments.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X14000894en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/WBV248AA/v/94774c36453f253af4b0162ca09828cden_US
dc.identifier.citationSabine Homann-Kee Tui, Diego Valbuena, Patricia Masikati, Katrien Descheemaeker, Justice Nyamangara, Lieven Claessens, Olaf Erenstein, Andre van Rooyen, Daniel Nkomboni. (31/3/2015). Economic trade-offs of biomass use in crop-livestock systems: Exploring more sustainable options in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems, 134, pp. 48-60.en_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/4891
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.sourceAgricultural Systems;134,(2015) Pagination 48-60en_US
dc.subjectcrop-livestocken_US
dc.titleEconomic trade-offs of biomass use in crop-livestock systems: Exploring more sustainable options in semi-arid Zimbabween_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2015-03-31en_US
dcterms.extent48-60en_US
mel.impact-factor2.867en_US

Files