Efficiency of Plant Breeding

cg.contacts.ceccarelli@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderEuropean Union, European Commission - EU-ECen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.02.0158en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0011-183Xen_US
cg.issn1435-0653en_US
cg.issue1en_US
cg.journalCrop Scienceen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwheaten_US
cg.subject.agrovocselectionen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclandracesen_US
cg.volume55en_US
dc.creatorCeccarelli, Salvatoreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-29T23:14:47Z
dc.date.available2021-04-29T23:14:47Z
dc.description.abstractParticipatory plant breeding (PPB) has been practiced for several reasons, including sociological, humanitarian, and egalitarian. This paper aims to demonstrate that PPB should be practiced simply because it increases plant breeding efficiency, which is defined as (i) the ratio between the number of varieties adopted and the number of crosses made, (ii) the response to selection, and (iii) the benefit/cost ratio, not only as often done by public breeding programs, by the number of varieties released by public breeding programs. After reviewing the reasons for the lack of adoption of several of the varieties released, and the theoretical basis justifying the use of correlated response to measure selection gains, the issue of the benefit/cost ratio is discussed within the context of adoption rates. The assumption is that without adoption, no benefit will occur. Ways to increase the three measures of breeding efficiency are discussed in detail, and the conclusion is made that the three measures can be increased by combining decentralized selection with farmers' participation in a PPB program. The essential features of a PPB program are reviewed, including the experimental designs and statistical analysis used to increase the precision of on-farm trials. The findings show that PPB increases breeding efficiency, both in terms of response to selection measured over the time from the initial cross to adoption and in terms of the benefit/cost ratio as a consequence of a higher adoption rate. In a PPB program, adoption starts during the process of selection and precedes variety release. In a conventional plant breeding (CPB) program, the sequence is reversed. Other differences between a PPB and a CPB program include the increase of agrobiodiversity, which in a PPB program is higher because of the rapid spatiotemporal turnover of varieties, and because the seed of new varieties is readily available to farmers, thus contributing to food security. Because of its decentralized nature, PPB can accommodate organic farms and become easily adopted by both national and international public breeding programs as one way of adapting crops to climate changes.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/dbf8e2267e0b40eddced758971737df3/v/43aad77c896e36af28cc8607104c5d57en_US
dc.identifier.citationSalvatore Ceccarelli. (1/2/2015). Efficiency of Plant Breeding. Crop Science, 55 (1), pp. 87-97.en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/13054
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCrop Science Society of Americaen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-ND-4.0en_US
dc.sourceCrop Science;55,(2015) Pagination 87-97en_US
dc.subjectadoptionen_US
dc.subjectenvironmentsen_US
dc.subjectgrain-yielden_US
dc.subjectand the conclusion is made that the three measures can be increased by combining decentralized selection with farmers' participation in a ppb program. the essential features of a ppb program are revieweden_US
dc.subjectarticipatory crop improvementen_US
dc.subjectagricultural-researchen_US
dc.subjectadaptation strategyen_US
dc.subjectbiodiversity lossen_US
dc.titleEfficiency of Plant Breedingen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2015-01-01en_US
dcterms.extent87-97en_US
dcterms.issued2015-02-01en_US
mel.impact-factor1.878en_US

Files