Response to soil salinity of two chickpea varieties differing in drought tolerance

cg.contactNader.Katerji@grignon.inra.fren_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies - CIHEAM - Barien_US
cg.contributor.centerWageningen University & Research Centre - WURen_US
cg.contributor.centerFrench National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment - INRAE Franceen_US
cg.contributor.centerConsiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura, Unità di ricerca per i sistemi colturali degli ambienti caldo aridi - CRA-SCAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.creator.idOweis, Theib: 0000-0002-2003-4852en_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00107-Xen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0378-3774en_US
cg.issue2en_US
cg.journalAgricultural Water Managementen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdrought toleranceen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsalt toleranceen_US
cg.subject.agrovocchickpeasen_US
cg.subject.agrovocleaf water potentialen_US
cg.subject.agrovocchickpeaen_US
cg.volume50en_US
dc.contributorvan Hoorn, J.W.en_US
dc.contributorHamdy, Atefen_US
dc.contributorMastrorilli, Marcelloen_US
dc.contributorOweis, Theiben_US
dc.contributorMalhotra, Rajinderen_US
dc.creatorKaterji, Naderen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-12T23:04:55Z
dc.date.available2022-04-12T23:04:55Z
dc.description.abstractTwo chickpea varieties, differing in drought tolerance, were grown in lysimeters filled with clay, and were irrigated with waters of three different salinity levels. Under non-saline conditions, both varieties, slightly differing in pre-dawn leaf water potential during the growth period, gave almost the same yield. Salinity had a slight effect on the leaf water potential and the osmotic adjustment. Both were slightly higher for the drought tolerant variety, but much lower in comparison with sugar beet, tomato and lentil. The drought tolerant variety showed an earlier senescence in leaf and dry matter development and flowering which were accelerated by salinity. The drought sensitive variety, however, showed under slightly saline conditions (ECe=2.5 dS/m) from 135 days after sowing onwards a different behaviour by the growth of new leaves and flowers, a delay in senescence, leading to the same yield as under non-saline conditions. Under saline conditions (ECe=3.8 dS/m) the drought sensitive variety showed the same yield reduction of about 70% as the drought tolerant variety.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationNader Katerji, J. W. van Hoorn, Atef Hamdy, Marcello Mastrorilli, Theib Oweis, Rajinder Malhotra. (4/9/2001). Response to soil salinity of two chickpea varieties differing in drought tolerance. Agricultural Water Management, 50 (2), pp. 83-96.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/67340
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.sourceAgricultural Water Management;50,(2001) Pagination 83-96en_US
dc.subjectosmotic adjustmenten_US
dc.subjectcrop water stressen_US
dc.subjectcrop water use efficiencyen_US
dc.titleResponse to soil salinity of two chickpea varieties differing in drought toleranceen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2001-09-04en_US
dcterms.extent83-96en_US
mel.impact-factor4.516en_US

Files