Variation in seed protein content in the annual wild Cicer species

cg.contactunknown97@unknown98.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0010%28199810%2978%3A2%3C220%3A%3AAID-JSFA105%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Ien_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0022-5142en_US
cg.issn1097-0010en_US
cg.issue2en_US
cg.journalJournal of the Science of Food and Agricultureen_US
cg.subject.agrovocbreedingen_US
cg.subject.agrovocgermplasmen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclegumesen_US
cg.subject.agrovoccicer arietinumen_US
cg.subject.agrovocpulsesen_US
cg.subject.agrovocqualityen_US
cg.subject.agrovocchickpeasen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclegumeen_US
cg.volume78en_US
dc.contributorRobertson, Larry D.en_US
dc.contributorSingh, K. Ben_US
dc.creatorOcampo, B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-13T20:51:20Z
dc.date.available2021-09-13T20:51:20Z
dc.description.abstractIn a search for higher seed protein content than in cultivated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L), the authors evaluated a collection of 228 accessions from the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), representing the eight annual wild species of the genus Cicer, along with 20 cultivated chickpea check lines. Variation in seed protein content ranged from 168 g kg(-1) in C cuneatum Hochst ex Rich to 268 g kg(-1) in C pinnatifidum Jaub & Spach, with an average seed protein content of 207 g kg(-1) over the eight wild species. C yamashitae Kitamura had the highest mean (217 g kg(-1)), while C echinospermum PW Davis had the lowest (192 g kg(-1)). The mean protein content of the cultivated checks was 188 g kg(-1). Significant variation was present in C judaicum Boiss, C pinnatifidum and C reticulatum Ladiz. C pinnatifidum had the highest number of accessions with high protein content. Overall, protein content showed negative association with harvest index, but little association with leaf area, days to maturity and canopy width. Although the variation for seed protein content of the collection showed accessions with higher protein content than with the cultivated checks, it falls within the range reported for cultivated chickpea. It is expected that agronomically superior selections from interspecific hybrids involving C arietinum and its annual relatives should not be inferior to the cultigen in protein content. Moreover, as usually occurs in distant hybridisation, unexpected epistatic effects could produce positive transgressive segregants, as has already been reported in Cicer. (C) 1998 Society of Chemical Industry.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationB. Ocampo, Larry D. Robertson, K. B Singh. (1/10/1998). Variation in seed protein content in the annual wild Cicer species. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 78 (2), pp. 220-224.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/13689
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherWiley (12 months)en_US
dc.sourceJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture;78,Pagination 220-224en_US
dc.subjectwild speciesen_US
dc.titleVariation in seed protein content in the annual wild Cicer speciesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1998-10-01en_US
dcterms.extent220-224en_US
dcterms.issued1998-10-01en_US
mel.impact-factor3.638en_US

Files