Bunts and smuts of wheat in North Africa and the Near East

cg.contactunknown123@unknown1234.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018343603827en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4896-2_14en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0014-2336en_US
cg.issn1573-5060en_US
cg.journalEuphyticaen_US
cg.subject.agrovocwild relativesen_US
cg.subject.agrovockarnal bunten_US
cg.subject.agrovocWheaten_US
cg.volume100en_US
dc.creatorMamluk, O. F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T23:57:45Z
dc.date.available2021-12-13T23:57:45Z
dc.description.abstractBunts [common bunt (Tilletia laevis and T. tritici) and dwarf bunt (T. controversa)] and smuts [loose smut (Ustilago tritici) and flag smut (Urocystis agropyri)] of wheat are important cereal diseases in most countries of north Africa and the Near East. There are no peculiarities in the occurrence of bunts and smuts, except for dwarf bunt, which is limited to high-altitude areas of Turkey, Iran and Iraq. Host adaptation, rather than topography, determines the distribution of the common bunt pathogens: ir: laevis predominates in bread wheat, whereas T. tritici attacks both bread and durum wheat non-preferentially. Incidence of bunt-and smut-affected wheat heads is generally low, however the frequency of their occurrence in fields is high, indicating their potential threat. Some bunts and smuts occur on hosts other than wheat, for example, nag smut on Aegilops crassa, loose smut on Ae. geniculata and rye, and dwarf bunt on Hordeum and Aegilops spp. Genetic variability of the pathogens causing common bunt and loose smut was investigated. Chemical seed treatment is the most widely used control for bunts and smuts. Organic nutrients as seed treatments to control common bunt of wheat show considerable promise. Sources of resistance to loose smut, and common and dwarf bunts of wheat, are available in wheat and its wild relatives. Triticum boeoticum, T. dicoccoides, and Aegilops species represent excellent sources of resistance to common bunt. There are three major sources of resistance in durum wheats, Senatore Cappelli and Haurani, Jenneh Khetifa, and Mindum. Common bunt resistance genes Bt5, Bt6, Bt8, Bt9, Bt10, and Bt11, and several undescribed resistances remain effective in the screening field at ICARDA, Syria.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationO. F. Mamluk. (1/1/1997). Bunts and smuts of wheat in North Africa and the Near East. Euphytica, 100, pp. 45-50.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/66569
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer (part of Springer Nature)en_US
dc.sourceEuphytica;100,Pagination 45-50en_US
dc.subjectprogenitorsen_US
dc.subjectincidenceen_US
dc.subjectresistanceen_US
dc.subjectvariabilityen_US
dc.subjectoccurrenceen_US
dc.titleBunts and smuts of wheat in North Africa and the Near Easten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1997-01-01en_US
dcterms.extent45-50en_US
dcterms.issued1997-01-01en_US
mel.impact-factor1.895en_US

Files