Selection for pod retention and pod indehiscence in lentils

cg.contactwilliam.erskine@uwa.edu.auen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countryLBen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00022869en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0014-2336en_US
cg.issn1573-5060en_US
cg.journalEuphyticaen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclentilsen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclens culinarisen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdehiscenceen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclentilen_US
cg.volume34en_US
dc.creatorErskine, Williamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-15T22:44:37Z
dc.date.available2021-07-15T22:44:37Z
dc.description.abstractThe genetic variation for seed yield losses and the response to selection for reduction of such losses was studied by a six-week delay in the timing of harvest in various segregating populations from four lentil crosses. The bulk segregating populations had previously been subjected to different numbers of selection by means of a delayed harvest. The loss in seed yield from a delayed harvest in the two seasons 1981/82 and 1982/83 accounted for 551 and 105 kg/ha seed, representing 34 and 11% of the yield from a correctly timed harvest respectively. Pod drop accounted for 65% of this loss, whereas dehiscence gave 35% of the loss in both seasons. The parents of cross 4 differed significantly for pod dehiscence, with genotype 74TA 550 showing relative indehiscence. Selection by means of a delayed harvest of bulk populations decreased pod dehiscence, mean seed weight and bulk mean yield.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationWilliam Erskine. (1/3/1985). Selection for pod retention and pod indehiscence in lentils. Euphytica, 34, pp. 105-112.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/13423
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer (part of Springer Nature)en_US
dc.sourceEuphytica;34,(1985) Pagination 105-112en_US
dc.subjectindehiscenceen_US
dc.subjectpod retentionen_US
dc.titleSelection for pod retention and pod indehiscence in lentilsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1985-03-01en_US
dcterms.extent105-112en_US
mel.impact-factor1.895en_US

Files