Introducing FAIR Scores in a Global Agricultural Science Reporting Service: An Analysis of the First Reporting Period

cg.contactsebastian.feger@gmail.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Tropical Agriculture - CIATen_US
cg.contributor.centerCodeObia - CodeObiaen_US
cg.contributor.centerAlliance Bioversity International and CIATen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectICARDA Corporate - Monitoring & Evaluationen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.creator.idFeger, Sebastian: 0000-0002-0287-0945en_US
cg.creator.idDe Col, Valentina: 0000-0003-0895-969Xen_US
cg.creator.idTobon, Hector: 0000-0002-0217-7323en_US
cg.creator.idBonaiuti, Enrico: 0000-0002-4010-4141en_US
dc.contributorDe Col, Valentinaen_US
dc.contributorAl-Najdawi, Moayaden_US
dc.contributorCadavid, Juanen_US
dc.contributorTobon, Hectoren_US
dc.contributorMartinez, Germanen_US
dc.contributorBonaiuti, Enricoen_US
dc.creatorFeger, Sebastianen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-21T13:46:03Z
dc.date.available2023-06-21T13:46:03Z
dc.description.abstractCommunicating the meaning and value of the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles and suitable implementation strategies to research communities and their broader ecosystem is a crucial challenge. Automated FAIR scoring algorithms are being developed to provide immediate machine-driven insight into (meta)data compliance. They are also expected to return instructions to improve FAIR compliance where applicable. However, we still lack a systematic understanding of how automated FAIR scoring impacts adoption in repositories that implement them. Accordingly, we are excited to share findings from the first large-scale machine-driven FAIR scoring of global agricultural research at One CGIAR, a global partnership of international organizations dedicated to sustainable food production. Characteristics that make this analysis particularly interesting include the organization-wide visibility of the FAIR scoring and the mandatory reporting of all scientific resources in the preceding calendar year. We find that 39% of the 418 records received updates. Out of those, 7.3% resulted in improved FAIR scores. Those improved records outperformed the mean FAIR scores of the complete 2022 reporting data, while falling behind them before the update. We further show differences according to the knowledge product type and outline how we gather additional data on users’ perceptions for the OR2023 presentation.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/1be1b8770542aa52b531c4577548a993/v/3b7043f3b5d522b68baf026577aabafeen_US
dc.identifier.citationSebastian Feger, Valentina De Col, Moayad Al-Najdawi, Juan Cadavid, Hector Tobon, German Martinez, Enrico Bonaiuti. (1/1/2023). Introducing FAIR Scores in a Global Agricultural Science Reporting Service: An Analysis of the First Reporting Period. Beirut, Lebanon.en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/68495
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-SA-4.0en_US
dc.subjectautomated fair scoringen_US
dc.subjectadoption and perception across scientists and data managersen_US
dc.subjectusage analysisen_US
dc.titleIntroducing FAIR Scores in a Global Agricultural Science Reporting Service: An Analysis of the First Reporting Perioden_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dcterms.available2023-01-01en_US
dcterms.issued2023-01-01en_US
mel.project.openhttps://mel.cgiar.org/projects/mel-icardaen_US

Files