Targeting Research for Poverty Reduction in Marginal Areas of Rural Syria

cg.contacta.aw-hassan@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countrySYen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.creator.idAw-Hassan, Aden A.: 0000-0002-9236-4949en_US
cg.creator.idThomas, Richard: 0000-0002-8009-5681en_US
cg.date.embargo-end-date2106-05-01en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2006.00493.xen_US
cg.issn0012-155Xen_US
cg.issue3en_US
cg.journalDevelopment and Changeen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclivelihoodsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocpoliciesen_US
cg.subject.agrovocpovertyen_US
cg.volume37en_US
dc.contributorAw-Hassan, Aden A.en_US
dc.contributorTurkelboom, Francisen_US
dc.contributorThomas, Richarden_US
dc.creatorLa Rovere, Robertoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-11T07:07:20Z
dc.date.available2018-03-11T07:07:20Z
dc.description.abstractAgricultural research in marginal dry areas can contribute to reducing poverty through the development of technological, institutional and policy options for poor farmers. Such research should address diversified opportunities and development pathways. This article analyses the diversity of livelihood strategies of rural people living in the Khanasser Valley in northwestern Syria, an area that is typical of marginal drylands. It proposes an operational classification of households based on their different livelihood strategies, applying an integrated methodology within a Sustainable Livelihoods framework. Households are classified into three clusters: agriculturists, labourers and pastoralists. The article examines the diversity of livelihoods involved, and considers where and how research should be directed to have greatest impact on poverty. Given that rural households are not homogeneous but dynamic entities, with diverse assets, capabilities and opportunities, the definition of household typologies can help to target development research. The article concludes that while agriculturists benefit most, poor labourers with enough land can also gain from pro-poor agricultural research. The poorest households with little land, and pastoralists, benefit little or only indirectly.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationRoberto La Rovere, Aden A. Aw-Hassan, Francis Turkelboom, Richard Thomas. (16/6/2006). Targeting Research for Poverty Reduction in Marginal Areas of Rural Syria. Development and Change, 37 (3), pp. 627-648.en_US
dc.identifier.statusLimited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/8039
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherWiley: 24 monthsen_US
dc.sourceDevelopment and Change;37,(2006) Pagination 627-648en_US
dc.subjectrural peopleen_US
dc.subjectdry areasen_US
dc.titleTargeting Research for Poverty Reduction in Marginal Areas of Rural Syriaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2006-06-16en_US
dcterms.extent627-648en_US
dcterms.issued2006-05-01en_US

Files