Variation in growth, development, and yield of durum wheat in response to high soil boron. II. Differences between genotypes

cg.contacts.yau@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1071/A96145en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issue7en_US
cg.journalAustralian Journal of Agricultural Researchen_US
cg.subject.agrovocphenotypic variationen_US
cg.volume48en_US
dc.contributorMiloudi, Nachiten_US
dc.contributorRyan, Johnen_US
dc.creatorYau, S. K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-20T19:36:54Z
dc.date.available2022-01-20T19:36:54Z
dc.description.abstractThis greenhouse study examined the variation in growth, development, and yield between 9 durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum Desf., syn. T. durum) lines in response to high soil boron (B) levels. The lines were selected to represent the range of B-toxicity tolerance in an earlier screening experiment. Three soil B levels (hot-water extractable B concentrations of 0·3, 7·1, and 17·4 mg/kg, designated as B0, B25, and B50, respectively) were set up by mixing different amounts of boric acid with soil. Foliar B-toxicity symptom score, dry weight, and shoot-B concentration were measured at tillering. Agronomic traits and yield were measured. There were differential responses to high soil B levels between the durum lines. The boron×line interaction was significant for B-toxicity symptom score and shoot-B concentration. Based on these 2 characters, and percentage of shoot dry weight and grain yield reduction from B0 to B50, Oued Zenati, Omrabi-5, and Gezira-17 were the most tolerant of the 9 durum lines, yet they were less tolerant to high soil B levels than the tolerant bread-wheat check, Halberd. Nonetheless, until more tolerant materials are developed, these moderately tolerant durum lines could still be useful for areas, like southern Australia, where B toxicity is a problem.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationS. K. Yau, Nachit Miloudi, John Ryan. (1/1/1997). Variation in growth, development, and yield of durum wheat in response to high soil boron. II. Differences between genotypes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 48 (7), pp. 951-958.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/66942
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen_US
dc.sourceAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research;48,Pagination 951-958en_US
dc.subjectboron toxicityen_US
dc.subjectfoliar symptomen_US
dc.subjectshoot boron concentrationen_US
dc.subjectyield components.en_US
dc.titleVariation in growth, development, and yield of durum wheat in response to high soil boron. II. Differences between genotypesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1997-01-01en_US
dcterms.extent951-958en_US
dcterms.issued1997-01-01en_US

Files