Can Retention of Crop Residues on the Field Be Justified on Socioeconomic Grounds? A Case Study from the Mixed Crop-Livestock Production Systems of the Moroccan Drylands

cg.contacttamer_149@hotmail.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Wheat - WHEATen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center - CIMMYTen_US
cg.contributor.projectCRP WHEAT Phase IIen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countryMAen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Africaen_US
cg.creator.idAl-Shater, Tamer: 0000-0002-0698-689Xen_US
cg.creator.idYigezu, Yigezu: 0000-0002-9156-7082en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081465en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn2073-4395en_US
cg.issue8en_US
cg.journalAgronomyen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdrylandsen_US
cg.subject.agrovocmoroccoen_US
cg.volume11en_US
dc.contributorYigezu, Yigezuen_US
dc.creatorAl-Shater, Tameren_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-29T22:50:56Z
dc.date.available2021-09-29T22:50:56Z
dc.description.abstractConservation agriculture (CA) involving zero tillage, crop diversification, and residue retention is considered a panacea for several interrelated problems in agricultural production. However, in the mixed crop-livestock production systems of the drylands, crop residues have great significance as sources of animal feed, posing a major challenge in the promotion of CA. While the economic benefits and the drivers of adoption of zero tillage and rotation have been well documented, the literature on the economics of residue retention (RR), especially in the drylands, is scanty. By applying the endogenous switching regression model to a case study of 2296 wheat fields in Morocco, this paper provides evidence on the socio-economic impacts of residue retention. Between 30% and 60% and above 60% of crop residues were retained respectively on 35% and 14% of wheat fields. These levels of residue retention led to 22% and 29% more yields, 25% and 32% higher gross margins and 22% and 25% more consumption of wheat, respectively. Retention of above 60% residue reduces both downside risk and variability of yield while lower levels of residue retention have mixed effects. Residue retention is economically and biophysically beneficial even for owners of livestock as the monetary value of the additional grain yield more than offsets the cost of purchasing an equivalent amount of feed from the market—all providing good economic justification for residue retention. Our findings show that economic reasons are not barriers for adoption of residue retention, but risk factors and absence of alternative feed sources might. The policy implication of our results is that there are high incentives for Morocco and other similar countries in North Africa andWest Asia to invest in the development and/or import of alternative feed sources, introducing crop insurance, and raising the awareness of the economic, biophysical and environmental benefits of residue retention among farmers.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/11f263f28be532d695a9f942c7857561/v/9824747ebed5f426c9ff4f5c2f914e13en_US
dc.identifier.citationTamer Al-Shater, Yigezu Yigezu. (23/7/2021). Can Retention of Crop Residues on the Field Be Justified on Socioeconomic Grounds? A Case Study from the Mixed Crop-Livestock Production Systems of the Moroccan Drylands. Agronomy, 11 (8).en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/66172
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0en_US
dc.sourceAgronomy;11,(2021)en_US
dc.subjectresidue retentionen_US
dc.subjectadoption and impactsen_US
dc.subjectmixed crop-livestock systemsen_US
dc.subjectdownside risk exposureen_US
dc.titleCan Retention of Crop Residues on the Field Be Justified on Socioeconomic Grounds? A Case Study from the Mixed Crop-Livestock Production Systems of the Moroccan Drylandsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2021-07-23en_US
mel.impact-factor3.417en_US

Files