Feeding differently processed soya bean Part 1. Effect on performance, protein utilization, relative organ weights, carcass traits and economics of producing broiler-chickens

cg.contactunknown316@unknown.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerFederal University of Technologyen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/food.19920360405en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn1613-4133en_US
cg.issue4en_US
cg.journalMolecular Nutrition & Food Researchen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsoya beansen_US
cg.subject.agrovocSoya beanen_US
cg.volume36en_US
dc.contributorOlonimoyo, F. Ien_US
dc.creatorAletor, Valentine Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-16T22:50:09Z
dc.date.available2021-09-16T22:50:09Z
dc.description.abstractThe comparative utilization of differently processed (roasted, cooked and oil cake) soya bean base diets and groundnut cake diet were evaluated in a feeding trial using 100 day-old Anak broiler-chicks. The response criteria included performance, protein utilization, relative organ weights, carcass traits and economy of production. At the end of the feeding trial, the average weight gains of chicks fed processed soya bean diets were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those fed groundnut cake and raw soya bean diets. Both feed consumption and efficiency were significantly (P < 0.05) enhanced by processing. For example, feed consumption was highest in the chicks fed soya bean oil cake and least in those fed raw bean. Feed efficiency was best in chicks fed roasted soya bean. The relative weights [g/100g body wt.] of the liver, kidneys, lungs, heart, gizzard and bursa were not significantly affected by the differently processed soya bean while the raw bean (unprocessed) significantly (P < 0.01) increased pancreas weight. The dressed weight [%], eviscerated weight [%] and the relative weight of the thigh, drumsticks, chest, back and head were not significantly influenced by the dietary treatments. However, the relative weights of the shank and belly fat were significantly (P < 0.05) affected. Cost-benefit analysis showed that the processed soya bean gave higher profit than groundnut cake diet. Among the soya bean diets, profit was in the order: roasted > cooked > oil cake > raw bean.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationValentine A Aletor, F. I Olonimoyo. (1/1/1992). Feeding differently processed soya bean Part 1. Effect on performance, protein utilization, relative organ weights, carcass traits and economics of producing broiler-chickens. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 36 (4), pp. 357-363.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/13715
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherWiley (12 months)en_US
dc.sourceMolecular Nutrition & Food Research;36,(1992) Pagination 357-363en_US
dc.subjectphaseolus-lunatusen_US
dc.titleFeeding differently processed soya bean Part 1. Effect on performance, protein utilization, relative organ weights, carcass traits and economics of producing broiler-chickensen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1992-01-01en_US
dcterms.extent357-363en_US
mel.impact-factor5.914en_US

Files