Under which conditions would a wide support be likely for a Multilateral Environmental Agreement for pollinator protection?

cg.contactS.Christmann@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.funderDeutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit - GIZen_US
cg.contributor.projectConservation of pollinator diversity for enhanced climate change resilienceen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countryMAen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Africaen_US
cg.creator.idChristmann, Stefanie: 0000-0002-2303-2449en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.004en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn1462-9011en_US
cg.journalEnvironmental Science and Policyen_US
cg.subject.agrovoceducationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocpollinatorsen_US
cg.volume91en_US
dc.creatorChristmann, Stefanieen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T00:17:29Z
dc.date.available2018-10-23T00:17:29Z
dc.description.abstractThe Nagoya Protocol (2010) demonstrated that Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEA) are still achievable. Pollination services are essential for biodiversity, agriculture, ecosystem services and human well-being, but in jeopardy as The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) confirmed. In 2016, thirteen mostly European countries established the Coalition of the Willing on Pollinators. This group of forerunners increased to twenty-one members. Recently, the European Union (EU) decided to join in 2018. What would be necessary to move forward towards a Multilateral Environmental Agreement for pollinator protection during the next three or four Conferences of the Parties (COP) of the Convention for Biological Diversity (CBD)? Current approaches for pollinator protection mostly require subsidies or donations, they are not scalable and might limit the number of countries promoting a multilateral agreement.This paper suggests a mix of four strategies and low-cost policy measures across sectors. They would be affordable even for Low Income Countries (LIC), but require addressing certain research gaps to set the stage for policymakers.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/c42ddb947f55578d34326dbaef60c459/v/86ed65782c54d35c1e6ef0c880de11b8en_US
dc.identifier.citationStefanie Christmann. (1/1/2019). Under which conditions would a wide support be likely for a Multilateral Environmental Agreement for pollinator protection. Environmental Science and Policy, 91, pp. 1-5.en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/8496
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier (12 months)en_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-ND-4.0en_US
dc.sourceEnvironmental Science and Policy;91,(2018) Pagination 1-5en_US
dc.subjectcost-effectiveen_US
dc.subjectcross-sectoren_US
dc.subjectpolicymakeren_US
dc.titleUnder which conditions would a wide support be likely for a Multilateral Environmental Agreement for pollinator protection?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2018-10-19en_US
dcterms.extent1-5en_US
dcterms.issued2019-01-01en_US
mel.impact-factor3.826en_US
mel.project.openhttps://mel.cgiar.org/projects/iki-pollinatorsen_US

Files