Evaluation of world collection of kabuli chickpea for resistance to iron-deficiency chlorosis

cg.contactg.bejiga@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Debere Zeit Agricultural Research Center - EIAR - DZARCen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00123277en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0925-9864en_US
cg.journalGenetic Resources and Crop Evolutionen_US
cg.subject.agrovocgermplasmen_US
cg.subject.agrovocchickpeasen_US
cg.volume43en_US
dc.contributorSingh, K. Ben_US
dc.contributorSaxena, Mohan C.en_US
dc.creatorBejiga, Geletuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-02T21:16:50Z
dc.date.available2020-12-02T21:16:50Z
dc.description.abstractIron-deficiency chlorosis is often seen in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) fields in the Mediterranean region and is particularly severe in fields where iron-deficiency susceptible cultivars are sown. Therefore, ICARDA's breeding programme field evaluated 6224 kabuli chickpea germplasm accessions for iron-deficiency chlorosis on a high pH Calcic Rhodoxeralf soil (pH 8.5, 20-25% calcium carbonate) at Tel Hadya, Syria during the winter and spring of 1987/88. Two resistant and 17 susceptible lines were grown during autumn, winter and spring of 1988/89 to examine the effect of sowing time on the appearance of the deficiency. About 99% of accessions showed no iron-deficiency symptoms. Evaluation of susceptible accessions during autumn, winter, and spring sowing revealed that iron-deficiency chlorosis was more pronounced during winter sowing. There were also significant genotype x season interactions, indicating differential responses of genotypes to time of sowing. Since the iron-deficiency chlorosis character is controlled by recessive genes, a negative selection to discard the susceptible lines from breeding material is recommended as an effective breeding strategy.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationGeletu Bejiga, K. B Singh, Mohan C. Saxena. (1/6/1996). Evaluation of world collection of kabuli chickpea for resistance to iron-deficiency chlorosis. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 43, pp. 257-259.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12148
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.sourceGenetic Resources and Crop Evolution;43,(1996) Pagination 257-259en_US
dc.subjectresistanceen_US
dc.subjectiron-deficiencyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of world collection of kabuli chickpea for resistance to iron-deficiency chlorosisen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1996-06-01en_US
dcterms.extent257-259en_US
mel.impact-factor1.071en_US

Files