Evaluation of the Adaptability of Different Sweet Lupin varieties for Feed production

cg.contactaletartir@yahoo.comen_US
cg.contributor.centerAmhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute, Gondar Agricultural Research Center - ARARI-GARCen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderAustrian Development Agency - ADAen_US
cg.contributor.projectReducing land degradation and farmers’ vulnerability to climate change in the highland dry areas of north-western Ethiopiaen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.admin-unitAmharaen_US
cg.coverage.countryETen_US
cg.coverage.geolocationLatitude: 12.32882211949879; Longitude: 37.46704012155533en_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.subject.agrovocadaptationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocevaluationen_US
cg.subject.agrovocvarietiesen_US
cg.subject.agrovocfeed productionen_US
dc.creatorTarekegn, Alemuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-24T11:38:47Z
dc.date.available2016-11-24T11:38:47Z
dc.description.abstractAccording to the results from the baseline study of the watershed, feed shortage was mentioned as the important problem for livestock productivity. This study was conducted to give the solution to this end. Sweet lupin seed and forage are used as the animal feeds in different part of the world. However, sweet lupin is new for our country and little information on the adaptability in different part of the country. It’s objective was therefore, to evaluate the adaptability and yield performance of sweet Lupin cultivars under the ecological condition of Gumara- Maksegnit watershed. Five sweet lupin cultivars were evaluated for their productivity and adaptability in Gumara –Maksegnet watershed for two years in RCBD. The analysis of variance showed that there is no statically difference among the tested cultivars for important forage parameters dry mater yield and grain yield. The dry mater yield and grain yield were ranged from 1.233 to 1.72 ton/ hectare and 1069.57 to 1778.16 kg/hectare in the first year, respectively. The corresponding values for the second years were 1.53 to 1.67 ton/hectare and 501.44 to 731 kg/hectare.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/reporting/downloadmelspace/hash/D8yWKXYs/v/27b52d85e59f233c18a6df2372adc130en_US
dc.identifier.citationAlemu Tarekegn. (30/6/2016). Evaluation of the Adaptability of Different Sweet Lupin varieties for Feed production.en_US
dc.identifier.statusOpen accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/5093
dc.languageenen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-4.0en_US
dc.subjectsweet lupin (lupinus spp. l.)en_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the Adaptability of Different Sweet Lupin varieties for Feed productionen_US
dc.typeInternal Reporten_US
dcterms.available2016-06-30en_US
mel.funder.grant#Austrian Development Agency - ADA :Korr/185-PP/2012en_US
mel.project.openhttp://rainfedsystems.icarda.org/en_US

Files