Integrated on-farm drainage management for drainage water disposal

cg.contactjames.ayars@ars.usda.goven_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerUnited State Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Natural Resource Management Research - USDA-ARS Mandanen_US
cg.contributor.funderCalifornia Department of Water Resourcesen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ird.1771en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn1531-0353en_US
cg.issue1en_US
cg.journalIrrigation and Drainageen_US
cg.subject.agrovocdrainageen_US
cg.subject.agrovocTomatoen_US
cg.subject.agrovocGarlicen_US
cg.volume63en_US
dc.contributorSoppe, Richarden_US
dc.creatorAyars, Jamesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-30T18:41:33Z
dc.date.available2020-10-30T18:41:33Z
dc.description.abstractProviding environmentally safe methods for disposal of drainage water containing salt and nutrients is a challenge for irrigated agriculture. A system developed for sequentially using saline drainage water for supplemental irrigation resulted in significant reduction of the drainage water volume. This system dubbed integrated on-farm drainage management' (IFDM) was demonstrated on four 65-ha fields located on a farm on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley of California. Three of the fields were used to grow salt-sensitive crops (tomato, garlic) and the fourth was used to grow salt-tolerant crops, e.g. Jose' tall wheatgrass. Subsurface drainage systems were installed on all fields at a maximum depth of 1.8m and had controls to regulate shallow water table position and drainage flow. The total drainage flow from the site represented 0.7% of the applied water. The area used for salt-tolerant crops was less than 6% of the total area served, compared to using evaporation ponds requiring areas equal to or greater than 10% of the served area. The results demonstrated that the regional groundwater quality masked the concentrating effect of crop water use. Deep percolation from the fields contributing to the reuse area ranged from 6 to 10% of the total applied water. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationJames Ayars, Richard Soppe. (1/2/2014). Integrated on-farm drainage management for drainage water disposal. Irrigation and Drainage, 63 (1), pp. 102-111.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12001
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltden_US
dc.sourceIrrigation and Drainage;63,(2014) Pagination 102-111en_US
dc.subjectserial biological concentrationen_US
dc.subjectdrainage water disposalen_US
dc.subjectdrainage water reuseen_US
dc.subjectintegrated drainage managementen_US
dc.titleIntegrated on-farm drainage management for drainage water disposalen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2014-01-24en_US
dcterms.extent102-111en_US
dcterms.issued2014-02-01en_US
mel.impact-factor1.202en_US

Files