Honeycomb Design for Selection among Homozygous Oat Lines1

cg.contactl.robertson@cgiar.ogen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerIowa State University - IASTATEen_US
cg.contributor.funderInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.projectCommunication and Documentation Information Services (CODIS)en_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1987.0011183X002700060003xen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0011-183Xen_US
cg.issn1435-0653en_US
cg.issue6en_US
cg.journalCrop Scienceen_US
cg.subject.agrovocbiomassen_US
cg.volume27en_US
dc.contributorFrey, K. J.en_US
dc.creatorRobertson, Larry D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-01T21:13:34Z
dc.date.available2021-07-01T21:13:34Z
dc.description.abstractThe honeycomb design has been proposed for evaluating the yielding ability of single plants of small grains. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of selection for grain yield via grain, adjusted grain, and biomass yields of single plants grown in a honeycomb design. Materials were 236 F10-derived lines of oats from a broad-based bulk population. They were tested as individual plants in two replicates of the honeycomb design in each of five environments and as lines in a hill-plot experiment with three replicates in each of three environments. Mean yields from the latter experiment were used as the standard for measuring selection effectiveness. Pooled correlations for grain, adjusted grain, and biomass yields of single plants with grain yield of oat lines measured in hill plots were 0.29 ± 0.06, 0.27 ± 0.06, and 0.37 ± 0.06, respectively. With a 10% selection intensity, the actual gain in grain yield (expressed as a percentage of the hill-plot population mean) of oat lines averaged 9.8 ± 0.05, 8.3 ± 0.06, and 11.0 ± 0.05, respectively, when grain, adjusted grain, and biomass yields of single plants were the selection criteria. Discarding of the lowest 10, 25, and 50% of plants for grain, adjusted grain, and biomass resulted in the average retention of 97, 90, and 70%, respectively, of the top decile of oat lines for grain yield. Our results suggest that selecting for grain or biomass yield of oat plants grown in a noncompetitive field arrangement can identify higher yielding oat lines. Selection for biomass gave about one-seventh more gain than did selection for grain yield. Adjustment of grain yield of a plant according to the mean of six neighboring plants in the honeycomb design reduced the predicted gains from selection.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationLarry D. Robertson, K. J. Frey. (1/11/1987). Honeycomb Design for Selection among Homozygous Oat Lines1. Crop Science, 27 (6), pp. 1105-1108.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/13314
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherCrop Science Society of Americaen_US
dc.sourceCrop Science;27,(1987) Pagination 1105-1108en_US
dc.subjectgrain yielden_US
dc.subjectsingle plant selectionen_US
dc.subjectadjusted grain yielden_US
dc.subjectavena sativa len_US
dc.titleHoneycomb Design for Selection among Homozygous Oat Lines1en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available1987-11-01en_US
dcterms.extent1105-1108en_US
mel.impact-factor1.878en_US

Files