Does Zero Tillage Improve the Livelihoods of Smallholder Cropping Farmers?

cg.contacty.yigezu@cgiar.orgen_US
cg.contributor.centerInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.contributor.centerThe University of Western Australia, Institute of Agriculture - UWA - IOAen_US
cg.contributor.crpCGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems - DSen_US
cg.contributor.funderAustralian Center for International Agricultural Research - ACIARen_US
cg.contributor.projectConservation Agriculture in Northern IRAQ Phase IIIen_US
cg.contributor.project-lead-instituteInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas - ICARDAen_US
cg.coverage.countryIQen_US
cg.coverage.countrySYen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Asiaen_US
cg.creator.idAl-Shater, Tamer: 0000-0002-0698-689Xen_US
cg.creator.idYigezu, Yigezu: 0000-0002-9156-7082en_US
cg.creator.idAw-Hassan, Aden A.: 0000-0002-9236-4949en_US
cg.date.embargo-end-dateTimelessen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12133en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.issn0021-857Xen_US
cg.issue1en_US
cg.journalJournal of Agricultural Economicsen_US
cg.subject.agrovoclivelihoodsen_US
cg.subject.agrovoczero tillageen_US
cg.subject.agrovocconsumptionen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsmallholdersen_US
cg.subject.agrovocpropensity score matchingen_US
cg.subject.agrovocfarm incomeen_US
cg.subject.agrovocsmallholder farmersen_US
cg.volume67en_US
dc.contributorYigezu, Yigezuen_US
dc.contributorMugera, Aminen_US
dc.contributorPiggin, Colinen_US
dc.contributorHaddad, Atefen_US
dc.contributorKhalil, Yaseenen_US
dc.contributorLoss, Stephen Peteren_US
dc.contributorAw-Hassan, Aden A.en_US
dc.creatorAl-Shater, Tameren_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-20T11:16:10Z
dc.date.available2016-09-20T11:16:10Z
dc.description.abstractThe biophysical benefits of zero tillage (ZT) are well documented in the literature. However, the literature on its economic benefits, especially in the context of small and medium-scale farmers in the temperate developing world is scanty. Using a study of 621 wheat farmers in Syria, we provide empirical evidence on the impacts of adoption of ZT on farm income and wheat consumption. We use propensity score matching (PSM) and endogenous switching regression (ESR) approaches to account for potential selection biases. After controlling for confounding factors, we find that adoption of the ZT technology leads to a US$ 189/ha (33%) increase in net crop income and a 26 kg (34%) gain in per capita wheat consumption per year (adult equivalent) – an indication of meaningful changes in the livelihoods of the farm households. Besides the biophysical and environmental benefits documented elsewhere, our results suggest that adoption of ZT can also be justified on economic and food security grounds. Therefore, ZT can have sizeable impacts in transforming the agricultural sector in the temperate developing world provided that the technology is well promoted and adopted.en_US
dc.formatPDFen_US
dc.identifierhttps://mel.cgiar.org/dspace/limiteden_US
dc.identifier.citationTamer Al-Shater, Yigezu Yigezu, Amin Mugera, Colin Piggin, Atef Haddad, Yaseen Khalil, Stephen Peter Loss, Aden A. Aw-Hassan. (1/2/2016). Does Zero Tillage Improve the Livelihoods of Smallholder Cropping Farmers. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67 (1), pp. 154-172.en_US
dc.identifier.statusTimeless limited accessen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/4902
dc.languageenen_US
dc.publisherWiley (12 months)en_US
dc.sourceJournal of Agricultural Economics;67,(2015) Pagination 154-172en_US
dc.subjectcropping farmsen_US
dc.subjectendogenous switching regressionen_US
dc.titleDoes Zero Tillage Improve the Livelihoods of Smallholder Cropping Farmers?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dcterms.available2015-12-09en_US
dcterms.extent154-172en_US
dcterms.issued2016-02-01en_US
mel.impact-factor2.506en_US
mel.project.openhttp://cana-project.org/en_US

Files